THE JUDGMENT No. 11/2014 OF THE COMMERCIAL COURT No. 9 OF BARCELONA OF JANUARY 11, 2024 (VEGAP v. MANGO): THE FRUSTRATED ISSUE ON NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENS AND THE FRUSTRANT INTERPRETATION OF THE SPANISH COPYRIGHT

Authors

  • Carla Bragado Herrero de Egaña Universidad Autónoma de Madrid – Université d’Évry Val d’Essonne

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21134/x67cy568

Keywords:

Non-fungible tokens, Intellectual Property, ownership of the material support of a work of art, Right of transformation, digital environment, fair use

Abstract

It is, to a certain extent, inevitable that every technological innovation that leads to new uses of protected works and related rights will raise new legal issues in relation to Intellectual Property law. In fact, VEGAP vs. MANGO seemed to provide a first opportunity for a European court to analyse some consequences of this phenomenon in terms of copyright law. However, this was not really the subject of the case, which was brought by the collecting society VEGAP in relation to certain acts of transformation and subsequent exhibition (physical, digital and virtual) of the MANGO company's creations on a series of images whose original supports it had acquired years earlier. In short, the Commercial Court of Barcelona focuses on a problem of articulation between intellectual property rights and the rights of the acquirer of the material support of a work of art. Its reasoning relies on the fair use clause contained in Section 107 of the American DMCA, supported by the theory of innocent use of another's right and a different interpretation of the three-step rule contained in Article 40 bis of the Spanish IP Law, following the Supreme Court's ruling of 3 April 2012. The ruling issued casts a particularly discouraging perspective for the interests of right holders, and overturns some of the basic fundamentals of our discipline.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BERCOVITZ RODRÍGUEZ-CANO, R., “Comentario a la Sentencia del Tribunal Supremo Núm. 172/2012, de 3 abril de 2012”, Cuadernos Civitas de Jurisprudencia Civil nº 90/2012, parte Sentencias (BIB 2012/2982).

GEIGER, CH., HILTY, R.M., GRIFFITHS, J., SUTHERSANEN, U., et. al., Declaración por una interpretación equilibrada de la regla de los tres pasos en el derecho de autor (disponible en: https://www.ip.mpg.de/fileadmin/ipmpg/content/forschung_aktuell/01_balanced/declaration_three_step_test_final_spanish1.pdf.).

LUCAS, A. y CÁMARA ÁGUILA, P., “Por una interpretación razonable de la regla de los tres pasos, o por qué hay que evitar la imprecisión: un estudio sobre la «declaración por una interpretación equilibrada de la regla de los tres pasos en derecho de autor»”, Pe. i. revista de propiedad intelectual nº 33 (septiembre/diciembre 2009), pp. 13-37.

MARTIAL-BRAZ, N., “Les NFT aux prises avec le droit des biens: essai d’une qualification”, Revue de droit bancaire et financier nº 4, juillet-août 2022, dossier nº 31, pp. 1-6.

VARET, V. y PRÈS, X., “ «NFT» : trois lettres déclinées au secteur de l’art”, Revue pratique de la prospective et de l’innovation nº 1, mai 2022, Dossier nº 9, pp. 40-43.

Intellectual Property Rights and Distributed Ledger Technology with a focus on art NFTs and tokenized art, Study requested by the JURI Committee (European Parliament), octubre de 2022.

REFERENCIAS JURISPRUDENCIALES

SJM nº 9 de Barcelona de 11 de enero de 2024, nº 11/2024 (Roj: SJM B 1/2024).

AJM nº 9 de Barcelona nº 468/2022 de 21 de octubre de 2022 (Roj: AJM B 1900/2022).

STS (Sala de lo Civil, Sección 1ª) de 3 de abril de 2012, nº 172/2012, Megakini c. Google (Roj: STS 3942/2012).

STJUE (Gran Sala) de 3 de julio de 2012, asunto C-128/11, UsedSoft c/ Oracle.

STJUE (Gran Sala) de 19 de diciembre de 2019, asunto C-263/18, Tom Kabinet BV.

STJUE (Sala Sexta) de 20 de abril de 2023, C-775/21 y C-826/21, Blue Air Aviation.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-11

Similar Articles

1-10 of 99

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.