Vertical study of online reputation tools to measure public relations and communication activity
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Since the 1960s the interest in measuring the function of public relations and corporate communication has noticeably increased, thus the emergence of proposals for measurement indicators simply followed suit. Some models that explored this activity have focused on analyzing the relationships established between an organization and its publics, while others have explored the concept of corporate reputation. Currently, this function is also monitored in social networks.
Method and Analysis: The present study has delved into the structure of online reputation metrics listed by famous market research company Forrester that regularly publishes the state of the art for these types of tools (Liu, 2020; 2021). Delving further into previous descriptive research (Cuenca Fontbona, Matilla & Compte-Pujol, 2016), a descriptive study has been carried out of the websites of the organisations offering these metrics or "social listening platforms". Additional primary data has been collected through qualitative semi-structured interviews with communication professionals (N=180) from Lithuania in organizations of various sectors, in order to explore the level of awareness, adoption and usefulness of these online measurement tools for strategic decision making.
Results: It can be firmly claimed that all these digital monitors stem from a tradition set on the construct of reputation, while relationships, the very essence of the public relations profession, are excluded. Besides, there is an enormous confusion of terminology and criteria about the variables used; the lack of a universally valid instrument is evident. The value proposition includes some type of exercise related to public relations and corporate communication, yet the “online” corporate reputation metrics fail to encompass the extensive multidisciplinary area of action that these disciplines display.
Conclusion: Although the management of intangible resources is a benchmark, these tools only provide quantitative information about the reputational image of a single stakeholder: consumers/customers, focusing on drivers related to the marketing and commercialization of the company’s products. Thus, they fail to provide comprehensive information on the reality of an organization’s corporate reputation.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Miguel Hernández Communication Journal is an open access magazine. To publish on MHCJ, the authors accept the following terms:
- The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right to first publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Atribución/Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional, which allows third parties share the work as long as its author and his first publication in this magazine are indicated.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (eg, deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated .
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations. of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
- The document RESIGNATION OF PERCEPTION OF BENEFITS OF COPYRIGHT is intended for the print publication of MHCJ by the UNIVERSITAS publishing house. Both authors and publishers renounce the collection of economic benefits, if any, when the aforementioned publisher takes over the entire cost of printing, distribution and dissemination.
How to Cite
References
Alloza, A., Carreras, E. y Carreras, A. (2012). Reputación Corporativa. Madrid: LID.
Álvarez-Nobell, A. y Lesta, L. (2011). “Medición de los aportes de la gestión estratégica de comunicación interna a los objetivos de la organización”. Palabra Clave, 14.
AMEC-International Association for the Measurement and Evaluation (n.d.). Corporate website. [http://amecorg.com].
AMEC; ICCO; Institute for Public Relations; Public Relations Society of America (2010). Barcelona Declaration of Measurement Principles. [https://amecorg.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Barcelona-Declaration-of-Measurement-Principles-2010.pdf]
Arboleda Naranjo, R. (2004). Indicadores de medida aplicados a la gestión de las relaciones públicas. Madrid: AENOR.
Argenti, P.A. (2014). Comunicación Estratégica y su contribución a la reputación. Madrid: LID.
Asociación de Directivos de Comunicación, Dircom (n.d.). Corporate website. [http://www.dircom.org].
Broom, G.M. (1977). “Coorientational measurement of public issues”. Public Relations Review, 3(4), pp. 110-119.
Broom, G. M. y Casey, S. (2000). “Concept and Theory of Organization – Public Relationships”. In: J.A. Ledingham y S.D. Bruning (coord.). Public Relations as Relationship Management: A Relational Approach to the Study and Practice of Public Relations. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Corporate Excellence-Centre for Reputation Leadership (n.d.). Corporate website. [http://blog.corporateexcellence.org].
Corporate Excellence-Centre for Reputation Leadership (2014). La medición en la economía de los intangibles: métricas específicas y visión holística. [http://www.corporateexcellence.org/index.php/Compartimos-conocimiento/La-medicion-en-la-economia-de-los-intangibles-metricas-especificas-y-vision-holistica].
Covelo, A. (2012). Evaluación de herramientas de medición de la reputación online: Introducción. [http://covelo.com/2012/08/29/evaluacion-de-herramientas-de-medicion-de-la-reputacion-online-introduccion/].
Cuenca-Fontbona, J. (2018). Cómo hacer un plan estratégico de comunicación. Vol. III: La investigación estratégica preliminar. Barcelona: UOC.
Cuenca-Fontbona, J., Matilla, K. & Compte-Pujol, M. (2016). “Medición de las relaciones públicas mediante modelos, indicadores y técnicas online en una sociedad conectada: un estudio vertical”. En: K. Matilla (ed.), Casos de estudio de relaciones públicas: Sociedad conectada: empresas y universidades. Barcelona: UOC, pp. 27-58.
Del Fresno, M. (2012). El consumidor social: reputación online y social media. Barcelona: UOC.
Delahaye Paine, K. (2011). Measure What Matters: Online Tools for Understanding Customers, Social Media, Engagement, and Key Relationships. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley and Sons.
DPRG/ICV Deutsche Public Relations Gesellschaft/Internationaler Conroller Verein. (2009). DPRG/ICV framework for communication measurement. Berlin: DPRG. [www.communicationcontrolling.com].
Downs, C.W. & Adrian, A.D. (2012). Assessing Organizational Communication Strategic Communication Audits. New York: Guilford Press.
EUPRERA-European Public Relations Education and Research Association (n.d.). Corporate website. [http://www.euprera.org].
European Communication Monitor (n.d.). Corporate website. [http://www.communicationmonitor.eu].
Ferguson, M.A. (1984). “Building theory in public relations: Interorganizational relationships as public relations paradigma”. Presentado en la conferencia anual de la Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Gainesville (FL).
Fombrun, C.J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. New York: Harvard Business School Press.
Forrester Research (n.d.). Corporate website. [https://www.forrester.com/home].
Global Alliance for Public Relations and Communication Management (n.d.). Corporate website. [http://www.globalalliancepr.org].
Grunig, J. E. y Hon, L. (1999). Guidelines for Measuring Relationships in Public Relations. Gainesville (FL): IPR. [http://www.instituteforpr.org/research_single/guidelines_measuring_relationships/].
Grunig J.E. y Huang Y.-H. (2000). “From Organizational Effectiveness to Relationships Indicators: Antecedents of Relationships, Public Relations Strategies, and Relationship Outcomes”. In: J.A. Ledingham; S.D. Bruning (coord.). Public Relations as Relationship Management: A Relational Approach to the Study and Practice of Public Relations. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.
INTED (2014). I Informe de Activos Intangibles en Ecosistemas Digitales. [http://www.corporateexcellence.org/index.php/Compartimos-conocimiento/I-Informe-de-Activos-Intangibles-en-Ecosistemas-Digitales-INTED].
Lindenmann, W. (2006). Public Relations Research for Planning and Evaluation. Gainesville (FL): IPR. [http://www.instituteforpr.org/files/uploads/2006_Planning_Eval.pdf].
Liu, J. & Dawson, S. (2020). The Forrester wave™: Social Listening Platforms, Q4 2020. Forrester Research Inc., November, 10.
Liu, J. (2021). Get smarter on social media measurement. Forrester Research Inc., May, 14.
Marca, G. (2018). Cómo hacer un plan estratégico de comunicación. Vol. IV: La investigación estratégica de evaluación. Barcelona: UOC.
Matilla, K. (2018). Cómo hacer un plan estratégico de comunicación. Vol. I: Un modelo de planificación estratégica, paso a paso. Barcelona: UOC.
Matrat, L. (1971). Relations publiques et management. Brussels: CERP.
MERCO-Monitor Empresarial de Reputación Corporativa (n.d.). Corporate website. [http://www.merco.info/es].
Merodio, J. (2010). Marketing en Redes Sociales: Mensajes de empresa para gente selectiva. [http://www.bubok.es/libros/191596/Marketing-en-Redes-Sociales-Mensajes-de-empresa-para-gente-selectiva].
Ponzi, L.J., Fombrun, C.J. y Gardberg, N.A. (2011). “RepTrakTM Pulse: Conceptualizing and Validating a Short-Form Measure of Corporate Reputation”. Corporate Reputation Review, 14(1). [http://www.stakeholderslab.nl/wp-content/uploads/CRR_v14_n1_Ponzi2.pdf].
PRSA-Public Relations Society of America (n.d.). Corporate website [https://www.prsa.org].
Riba, C. (2009). Introducció als mètodes d’investigació en psicología. Barcelona: UOC.
Seltzer, T. (2006). Measuring the Impacts of Public Relations: A Coorientational Approach to Analyze the Organization-Public Relationship. Gainesville (FL): IPR [http://www.instituteforpr.org/files/uploads/2005_ Seltzer.pdf].
Stacks, D.W. (2006). Dictionary or Public Relations Measurement and Research. Gainesville (FL): IPR. [http://www.instituteforpr.org/files/uploads/PRMR_Dictionary_1.pdf].
The Institute for Public Relations (n.d.). Corporate website. [http://www.instituteforpr.org].
Van Riel, C.B.M. (2012). Alinear para ganar. Madrid: LID.
Van Riel, C.B.M. y Fombrun, C.J. (2007). Essentials of corporate communication: Implementing practices for effective reputation management. London: Routledge.
Villafañe, J. (2004). La buena reputación. Claves del valor intangible de las empresas. Madrid: Pirámide.
Wartick, S. (2002). “Measuring Corporate Reputation: Definition and Data”. Business & Society, 41(4).
Watson, T. y Zerfass, A. (2011). “Return on investment in public relations: A critique of concepts used by practitioners from communication and management sciences perspectivas”. PRism 8(1): [http://www.prismjournal.org/ homepage.html].
Wilcox, D.L., Cameron, G.T.y Xifra, J. (2012). Relaciones Públicas: estrategias y tácticas. 10ª ed. Madrid: Pearson Educación.
Xifra, J. (2011). Manual de Relaciones Públicas e Institucionales. Barcelona: UOC.
Zerfass, A., Verdic, D., Verhoeven, P., Moreno, A. y Tench, R. (2015). European Communication Monitor 2015. Creating communication value through listening, messaging and measurement. Results of a Survey in 41 Countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.