Codex Lunaris: Fictitious Cartographies and Non-Dystopian Futures

Main Article Content

Sandra Aicart

Abstract

Fictitious cartography and critical fabulation operate as epistemic strategies through which dominant narratives of space colonization and extraction may be interrogated. This article examines how the articulation of ruins, impossible monuments, quotidian scenes, and imagined fauna functions as a speculative dispositif for reflecting on fragility, precarity, critical temporalities, and alternative spatial relations. Through these visual constructions, the Moon is reconfigured from a neutral astronomical body into a symbolic and contested territory, where the ordinary and the extraordinary coexist within a shared interpretive field. The artistic project Codex Lunaris is analyzed as a fictitious archive that extends what Hal Foster has described as the “archival impulse,” mobilizing speculative fabrication as a critical methodology. Conceived as a laboratory of futures, the project challenges linear models of progress and extractivist paradigms in space exploration. It proposes instead that imagining non-dystopian futures requires foregrounding coexistence, micro-ecologies, and structural exposure as constitutive conditions of experience, thereby opening alternative modes of inhabiting and perceiving extraplanetary territories.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

MONOGRÁFICO

Author Biography

Sandra Aicart, University of Barcelona

(sheIs an artist and researcher working in the field of visual culture and artistic research. Her work focuses on the construction of fictional archives, speculative imaginaries, and critical narratives related to cartography, territory, and possible futures. Through practices that combine AI-based image generation, digital editing, and theoretical reflection, she explores the relationships between technology, memory, and spatial representation. She is currently developing the project Codex Lunaris, centered on lunar cartography and imaginaries of extraplanetary habitability.

How to Cite

Aicart, S. (2026). Codex Lunaris: Fictitious Cartographies and Non-Dystopian Futures. ReCIA - Journal of the Arts Research Centre, 3, 151-172. https://doi.org/10.21134/v0kh9s18

References

Crary, Jonathan (2015). 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep. Verso.

Derrida, Jacques (1995). Archive fever: A Freudian Impression. University of Chicago Press.

Foster, Hal (2004). An Archival Impulse. October, 110, 3-22.

Garcés, Marina (2017). Nueva ilustración radical. Anagrama.

Haraway, Donna J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

Hartman, Saidiya (2008). Venus in Two Acts. Small Axe, 12(2), 1-14.

Le Guin, Ursula K. (2019). The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction. Ignota Press.

Mbembe, Achille (2017). Critique of Black Reason. Duke University Press.

Muñoz, José Esteban (2009). Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. NYU Press.

Redfield, Peter (2015). Space in the Tropics: From Convicts to Rockets in French Guiana. University of California Press.

Steyerl, Hito (2013). The Wretched of the Screen. Sternberg Press.

Whitaker, Ewen A. (1999). Mapping and Maming the Moon: A History of Lunar Cartography and Nomenclature. Cambridge University Press.