Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to ensure that their submission meets all of the items listed below. Submissions that do not adhere to these guidelines will be returned to the authors.
- The contribution being submitted has not been previously published, nor is it under consideration for publication in another journal (or an explanation has been provided in the Comments to the Editor).
- The submitted file should be in Microsoft Word format.
- Web addresses have been added for references where appropriate.
- The text is single-spaced; the font size is 12 points, preferably Times New Roman; italics are used instead of underlining (except for URLs); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text where they belong, rather than at the end.
- The text complies with the bibliographic and style requirements indicated in the Author Guidelines provided here.
- If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, ensure that the double-blind peer review instructions referred to in our guidelines and throughout the journal information have been followed.
- The text adheres to appropriate use of inclusive language.
- The text includes information on whether the research data consider gender, in order to identify potential differences.
Editorial
Política de sección por defecto
Noticias
Por defecto
Artículos y Estudios
Por defecto
Comentarios sobre Ordenación y Temas de Actualidad
Por defecto
Referencias formativas, ponencias, comunicaciones, seminarios y conferencias
Por defecto
Recensiones y reseñas bibliográficas destacadas
Por defecto
Copyright Notice
Copyright Notice Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- ROSM is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of the work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works (See The Effect of Open Access).
Privacy Statement
INFORMATION CLAUSE
In accordance with Regulation (EU) 679/2016, the General Data Protection Regulation, and current legislation, we inform you that the data provided in this document will be processed, as the data controller, by the Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche (UMH).
The purpose of processing the data is to manage author and reader registration for JMPPP. The names and email addresses entered in this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes stated by this journal and will not be available for any other purpose or person.
The legal basis for processing your data is consent. Furthermore, the data will be used to send information, by any means, about the aforementioned purposes. Your data will not be transferred to third parties, except in cases necessary for the proper attention, development, control, and fulfillment of the expressed purposes, as well as in cases provided by law. You may exercise your rights of Access, Rectification, Erasure, Restriction of processing, Data portability, or Objection to processing at the Universidad Miguel Hernández, Av. de la Universitat, s/n 03202 ELX-ELCHE (Alacant), Valencia Land. Spain. on the UMH electronic headquarters.
For more information, please visit our Privacy Policy.
Publications Ethics and malpractice Statement
A: Publication and authorship
- The submitted papers must be original and unpublished. The journal will use anti-plagiarism tools to ensure this.
- All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two national and international reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
- The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language.
- The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
- If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
- Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
- The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
- No research can be included in more than one publication.
B: Authors' responsibilities
- Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
- Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
- Authors must participate in the peer review process.
- Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
- All Authors must have significantly contributed to the research.
- Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
- Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
- Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
- Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors.
C: Reviewers' responsibilities
- Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.
- Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
- Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
- Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
- Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
- Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
D: Editors' responsibilities
- Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
- Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
- Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
- Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
- Editors should have a clear picture of a research's funding sources.
- Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers' importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication's scope.
- Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.
- Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
- Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
- Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
- Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
- Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
- Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.
